Psych Blog #4

Last week I had posted an article on Facebook in my “Psychology of Social Media” group page that talked about how social media and news could warp people’s memories. There was a specific focus on false information that was spread through social media among friends. I will repeat a portion of my post to lay a framework for further elaboration on the article: “The article detailed a phenomenon known as memory convergence. In short, this is the process by which a group of people come to agree on what happened. Social media allows for people to share ideas that are often reinforced by people with a similar viewpoint. The danger in this is that false information can quickly become circulated in these groups at large and distort the memories that people have of these events. This idea ties into the phenomenon of group think, which can be dangerous in regards to false information being accepted and stored into memories as vetted facts.”

People’s thought processes and memories of events can be manipulated when inaccurate information is supported by a large mass of people. This is reminiscent of Asch’s famous conformity experiments conducted in the 1950s. The tests showed that people will often conform to the majority’s consensus, even if they, individually, may think it’s wrong. The same principle still applies to users on social media today regarding shared information and news. What complicates matters even worse is when users have immersed themselves in only like-minded individuals (via control of the Friend’s list on Facebook). This behavior often leads to people fading out of the individual mindset and into the large body of group-consensus and shared ideas.

I frequently see people on social media post something involving a strongly held idea or opinion on a controversial subject that follows with the phrase “this should clear out my friends list.” How detrimental is it to isolate ourselves from differing viewpoints so that we can comfortably put on the blinders to allow for tunnel vision into our own ideas? The construction of an echo-chamber of ideas that posts like these catalyze is destructive to the framework of sound reasoning and critical thinking. Surrounding oneself with staunch supporters doesn’t allow you to hear or consider the voice of opposing ideas. I believe that this is unhealthy and, in the absence of opposition, can lead to the acceptance of more radical ideas.

As an addendum:


In class this week we discussed some of the differences between traditional media (newspapers, TV reporting agencies, Radio, etc...) and social media. Traditional media is generally a one-way communication system whereby users listen to the information, but have no way of responding. Social media, however, is a two-way communication system that allows the audience to reply and interact with the newscaster. Also, traditional media often takes longer to deliver information to the public due to its more stringent publishing and editing process. Social media is free from these restraints which allows it to deliver news to its audience nearly immediately. But what price do we pay for this immediacy? Accuracy. Accuracy is often forfeited in the race to be first. It takes time to thoroughly review and vet information for factual value, a process that social media doesn’t have time for. Are we willing to accept this sacrifice to quench our demand for speed of delivery?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

2nd Blog

In my psychology class this week we discussed the future of social media, and the continued existence of Facebook specifically. Can Facebook stand the test of time and remain an actively used site throughout the near and far future? Or will it eventually crumble and fade out like nearly every other social media site has experienced in the past? According to research conducted by Princeton University in 2014, they suggest the latter. Princeton University made an interesting analogy between that of Facebook and an infectious disease. By comparing a growth curve from a contagious disease to social media, Princeton University researchers found that Facebook will lose 80% of its users by 2017. We can now see that they were wrong. If you are like me, you may be surprised that such a prestigious institution had a horribly incorrect conclusion from the results of their data. The question that must be begged is why? I assert that their analogy was a poor comparison. Not for the reason of
Read more

Psych Blog 9

We have all heard that nothing is ever really free. In class this week we looked at how services such as Google and Facebook make money when they charge nothing for their usage. It is through advertisement companies that these online businesses generate their revenue. I was always under the impression that we, the people, were the consumers of these free online website. However, we are the product that these sites are selling to ad companies. The purpose of these free sites is to get as many users as possible that way the ad companies will pay more to have the rights to put their products in front of our eyes.  In the past several decades it seems that people are becoming more wary about people gaining access to their information through the internet. Some of this worry is understandable due to deleterious acts of hackers stealing personal information such as credit cards, social security numbers, passwords, and bank accounts. However, much of the concern is over hyped and unneeded.
Read more

Blog post 7

This week in class we discussed the effects social media can have on peer pressuring people (children in particular) to conform to certain behaviors. Kids are very impressionable so when they see their peers or even other social media stars engaging in certain activities, they are likely to try it as well. This can have very negative consequences when the behaviors involve smoking, doing drugs, drinking alcohol, or other disorderly conduct. Most of the articles focused on the negative aspects, but if the influenced is unbiased in terms of good versus bad, then I say we look at the positive things that can come from this. People can be motivated if they see their “friends” on social media volunteering in the community, working out, or pursing their goals in life. It would be nice if social media could regulate the content on its feed so that illegal or largely held socially unacceptable actions could be blocked. However, this would be a difficult task since it would infringe upon the f
Read more