Blog 13


Class this week revolved around the topic of slacktivism. This term is used to refer to the phenomenon whereby people put in minimal effort, generally through the medium of the internet, to help with a cause. People tend to still get a good feeling from there minimal effort because they feel like they have made a sufficient contribution to the cause. Therein lies the problem. Most of the time their minimal effort is not enough to generate a change. The question that remains is: is it better to have millions of slacktivists or thousands of activists?

Slacktivism is no doubt great at raising awareness about issues. People seem to have no problem sitting behind their computer or phone and retweeting or sharing posts about charity events. GoFundMe pages and other major charity organizations looking to raise money garner millions of shares on social media platforms each year. However, out of the millions that share the article or link to donate, only a small percentage actually contribute their time or money. This pattern amasses a plethora of publicity, but a deficit in funds and helping hands.

Aside from the monetary aspect, slacktivism may hinder actual progress in the form of policy changes or social justice cases. Its one thing to appear to support something online, but when you are absent in the physical world to offer support to a cause, the effect may be minimal. I must confess that I am guilty of slacktivism myself. I feel that I am helping out when I share posts about raising money for charities or change the colors of my profile pic to rally behind a cause. But in actuality how much of a difference am I really making?

Raising awareness about issues is a great thing and social media platforms amplify this event. But how far will increased awareness alone get us? If everyone suddenly knows about the issue but still doesn’t donate anything to it, then nothing has changed. It is a difficult problem to address because how do you tell people to give more when they think they are already doing enough for a cause that doesn’t necessitate contribution on their part; the essence of charity and selfless giving.

This class discussion has made me more aware that I may need to reduce the amount of charitable events I am sharing with people, and increase my level of engagement with a select few of them.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blog 10

Social media may have originally been thought to be an outlet for socializing with close friends, but it has outgrown that limited role. Social media is now a billion dollar industry that companies will pay to advertise to its users. Social media has also become so commonplace that employers are now looking into potential candidate’s accounts before hiring. Countless stories have surfaced over the years of applicants not being hired because of what they have posted online. Not only have applicants been hurt by what they post, but people who have already landed the job have been fired over their inappropriate posts. Some of those posts have included inappropriate rants, foul language, drugs, alcohol, or illicit actions. Not only have many people lost their jobs because of a post, but many have been thrusted into the spotlight and been publicly shamed for their inappropriate actions and resulting consequences. It’s crazy to think that the 2 minutes it took you to post a pic or type a co
Read more

Blog 12

Crowdsourcing was the topic of discussion this week in class. We talked about how the internet can rally people together (the crowd) to offer resources for a certain cause. Ultimately this can turn out to be for very good reasons. Some of the positive things that can come from this include crowdfunding money for a certain cause, helping people find a lost item/person, and raising awareness about a certain idea/ailment. We covered one of the most successful crowdfunding events to occur which was the ALS Ice bucket challenge. This campaign raised millions of dollars and helped promote awareness about a debilitating disease. I had always assumed that everyone was in awe of this positive impact and didn’t see any reason why not to donate, unless of course you just didn’t have the money to donate or simply didn’t feel like it. I am glad that our professor shared with us the story of why Mike Rowe chose not to donate or jump on board with this idea. Mike Rowe reasoned that in the world
Read more

2nd Blog

In my psychology class this week we discussed the future of social media, and the continued existence of Facebook specifically. Can Facebook stand the test of time and remain an actively used site throughout the near and far future? Or will it eventually crumble and fade out like nearly every other social media site has experienced in the past? According to research conducted by Princeton University in 2014, they suggest the latter. Princeton University made an interesting analogy between that of Facebook and an infectious disease. By comparing a growth curve from a contagious disease to social media, Princeton University researchers found that Facebook will lose 80% of its users by 2017. We can now see that they were wrong. If you are like me, you may be surprised that such a prestigious institution had a horribly incorrect conclusion from the results of their data. The question that must be begged is why? I assert that their analogy was a poor comparison. Not for the reason of
Read more