Psych Blog #5

     In class discussion this week we talked about fake and sloppy news. With the ease of sharing articles on social media with the click of a button, it is easy for false information to spread quickly. Also, people on social media generally have the mindset of quickly skimming information to catch the highlights instead of deeply reading the information. This absence of critical thinking and checking the validity of a document accelerates the mass distribution of false information. A relatively benign example of this, that I have come across, is people sharing a weather forecast for a big snow that is supposed to hit in the next couple of days. When I clicked on the article to read about this snow I saw that it was dated several years ago. Most people just read the catchy headline “Possible Foot of Snow to Impact the Area Friday” and don’t click on the site to verify that it is accurate and up to date information. But what happens when the misinformation spread is not as benign?

     Social media undoubtedly had a huge impact in last year’s United States’ presidential election when Donald J. Trump was elected 45th president. Under the impression that any publicity, positive or negative, is good publicity, Mr. Trump basked in the light of media attention. With the condemnation of most major Television News Agencies for being biased as either pro democratic or pro republican, many people turned away from TV news. People began taking to social media to talk about and attain a lot of their information for the candidates at hand. Not that this information was any more unbiased or true, but the process of friends sharing news articles seemed to make them more legitimate, especially if they were not from one of the “corrupted” major news organizations.

     The huge debate surrounding Russia’s involvement with the United States election concerns their usage of social media. Many officials argue that Russia influenced the election in favor of Trump by creating thousands of fake social media accounts with pro-Trump propaganda. From criticisms of the Democratic Party, to advertisements for Trump, to organizing political rallies, all under the guise of posts from a fellow American, Russia was able to allegedly meddle in the election. If this is all true and this played a large enough role to turn the tide of the election, what does this have to say about the impact of social media and where most people acquire their news?


     Mr. Trump played a major role in painting certain news organizations as invalid and corrupt by labeling them as “Fake News.” This allowed him to ease his way out of many counterarguments by simply dismissing their argument as invalid, instead of actually having to debate the issue at hand; a tactic commonly referred to as the ad hominem fallacy. The term “Fake News” has spread like wildfire not only in the United States, but through other parts of the world as well. Next week in class we seek to uncover the true definition of this term and how it has evolved to its usage in mainstream media today. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

2nd Blog

In my psychology class this week we discussed the future of social media, and the continued existence of Facebook specifically. Can Facebook stand the test of time and remain an actively used site throughout the near and far future? Or will it eventually crumble and fade out like nearly every other social media site has experienced in the past? According to research conducted by Princeton University in 2014, they suggest the latter. Princeton University made an interesting analogy between that of Facebook and an infectious disease. By comparing a growth curve from a contagious disease to social media, Princeton University researchers found that Facebook will lose 80% of its users by 2017. We can now see that they were wrong. If you are like me, you may be surprised that such a prestigious institution had a horribly incorrect conclusion from the results of their data. The question that must be begged is why? I assert that their analogy was a poor comparison. Not for the reason of
Read more

Psych Blog 9

We have all heard that nothing is ever really free. In class this week we looked at how services such as Google and Facebook make money when they charge nothing for their usage. It is through advertisement companies that these online businesses generate their revenue. I was always under the impression that we, the people, were the consumers of these free online website. However, we are the product that these sites are selling to ad companies. The purpose of these free sites is to get as many users as possible that way the ad companies will pay more to have the rights to put their products in front of our eyes.  In the past several decades it seems that people are becoming more wary about people gaining access to their information through the internet. Some of this worry is understandable due to deleterious acts of hackers stealing personal information such as credit cards, social security numbers, passwords, and bank accounts. However, much of the concern is over hyped and unneeded.
Read more

Blog post 7

This week in class we discussed the effects social media can have on peer pressuring people (children in particular) to conform to certain behaviors. Kids are very impressionable so when they see their peers or even other social media stars engaging in certain activities, they are likely to try it as well. This can have very negative consequences when the behaviors involve smoking, doing drugs, drinking alcohol, or other disorderly conduct. Most of the articles focused on the negative aspects, but if the influenced is unbiased in terms of good versus bad, then I say we look at the positive things that can come from this. People can be motivated if they see their “friends” on social media volunteering in the community, working out, or pursing their goals in life. It would be nice if social media could regulate the content on its feed so that illegal or largely held socially unacceptable actions could be blocked. However, this would be a difficult task since it would infringe upon the f
Read more